Poor regulation restricts effect of Alcohol Act

Findings of new Massey University Research

Auckland, June 9, 2018

Changes introduced by the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act (2012) have had no effect on the drinking habits of New Zealanders, according to a Massey University research.

The findings of the Research, led by Steve Randerson of Social And Health Outcomes Research And Evaluation (SHORE) at the Massey University College Of Health and Whariki Research Centre, was published yesterday (Friday, June 8, 2018) in the New Zealand Medical Journal.

The Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act was implemented in 2013, with the aim of minimising harm from excessive consumption of alcohol.

The main effect of the Act was to restrict very late-night trading (after 4 am) in a relatively small number of on-licence venues in New Zealands main cities.

Mr Randerson he and his team assessed the impact of the Act on the drinking environment by reviewing public datasets and reports and interviewing alcohol regulatory staff.

Subversion by Suppliers

We found little evidence that the Act had affected the alcohol environment between 2013 and 2015, other than a small reduction in on-licence trading hours in New Zealands main cities. The process of establishing local alcohol policies to protect health has been subverted by the appeals of alcohol suppliers whose resources are greater than those of local authorities and health agencies.

The Act permitted City Councils to develop a local alcohol policy regulating where and when alcohol can be sold, but only five had done so by 2015.

Extensive legal appeals, most commonly from alcohol suppliers, delayed many Councils from starting or completing a policy. Some of these difficulties could have been averted if the policy development process was protected from the influence of alcohol suppliers, Mr Randerson said.

Monitoring Minors

Regulatory staff reported social supply of alcohol to minors was particularly difficult to monitor. Generally speaking, minors are provided alcohol in private settings, by family or friends. This suggests other strategies to encourage compliance with the social supply regulations will remain important, Mr Randerson said.

Enforcement resources did not increase after the law change, making it a challenge to monitor the regulations.

This highlights the continuing need for alcohol policies proven to impact harm, at low cost, such as increasing alcohol tax and phasing out alcohol advertising and sponsorship, he said.

Easy to procure

The study also suggests purchasing alcohol while intoxicated remained moderately easy, and that improved monitoring of venues, with swifter enforcement, could increase compliance.

Changes in New Zealands alcohol environment following implementation of the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act (2012) was written by Steve Randerson, Dr Taisia Huckle and Professor Sally Casswell from Massey Universitys SHORE and Whriki Research Centre.